Methodology of Societal Complexity

 

Global Safety & Sustainable Development & Healthcare

 

7th International Conference on Social Science Methodology

Campus di Monte Sant’Angelo Naples, Italy, Europe

 

 

RC33 September  1-5, 2008

Dorien DeTombe & Rosanna Memoli

 

 

Volume 17

 

 

 

Methodology of Societal Complexity: Global Safety & Sustainable Development & Healthcare

7th International Conference on Social Science Methodology

Campus di Monte Sant’Angelo Naples, Italy, Europe

RC33 September  1-5, 2008

Volume 17

Dorien DeTombe & Rosanna Memoli

ã Greenhill & Waterfront, Dorien J. DeTombe

Publisher: Greenhill & Waterfront,

Europe: Amsterdam , The Netherlands ; Guilford , UK

North-America: Montreal , Canada

greenhillwaterfront@hotmail.com

ISBN/EAN  9789077171271

Version 001 

pages 10

March 2008

Nur 916

Language English

10 Euro

pages 10

 


7th International Conference on Social Science Methodology

Campus di Monte Sant’Angelo Naples, Italy, Europe

RC33 September  1-5, 2008

 

Chair: Dorien DeTombe & Rosanna Memoli

 

International Research Society on Methodology of Societal Complexity

Euro working Group on Methodology of Societal Complexity

P.O. Box. 3286, 1001 AB Amsterdam,

The Netherlands , Europe Tel: +31 20 6927526

E-Mail: DeTombe@nosmo.nl

http://www.geocities.com/doriendetombe

 

Methodology of Social Research, Faculty of Statistic -" La Sapienza "  

University of Rome , Italy , Europe

E-Mail: Rosanna.Memoli@uniroma1.it

 

The subject of Methodology Handling Complex Societal Issues:

 

Methodology of Handling Complex Societal Issues focuses on methods and tools for analyzing, structuring, guiding and evaluating complex societal problems.

Complex societal problems are often policy problems that can occur in many fields, like in the Agro-industry (Mad-Cow disease, BSE; Foot- and Mouth disease; Fowl Plague), in the transportation sector, in healthcare (Malaria, HIV/AIDS, Sars, Flu), in Water affairs. It focuses also on handling local safety problems like large city issues and natural disasters as flood and hurricanes and global safety problems like war, terrorism. Although many of these issues have a different cause, they have so much in comment that they can be approached in the same way. Besides that, being in Africa means also to be confronted with the complexity of the AIDS/HIV problem.

Complex societal problems, as such, are unstructured, dynamical and constantly changing and have a large impact on society on macro, meso and on micro level.

Handling complex societal problems needs a special interdisciplinary approach. The content knowledge comes from content experts. The process knowledge comes from facilitators. The attention of the research group is on the methods and tools facilitators need for supporting these kinds of problems. The facilitators use methods specially created for the field of societal problems combined with methods and insights derived from their original field like medicine, law, economics, societal sciences, methodology, mathematics, computer sciences, technology, engineering sciences, chaos theory and operational research. Often a combination of methods is needed. In this way the field uses all kind of methods from social sciences and operational research. An often-used approach is simulation. A simulation model is one of the powerful tools to describe societal complexity. With simulation models one cannot only understand the causal relations between the phenomena but also see what effect changes have.

 

The set of lectures focuses on methodology of handling real life complexity with an emphasis on global safety, sustainable development and healthcare

 

Keywords: Methodology, complex societal issues, decisions, sustainable development, global safety, healthcare


Stream: Methodology of Societal Complexity

 

Session I:           Societal Complexity: Safety and Healthcare

 

Chair: Dorien DeTombe

 

International Research Society on Methodology of Societal Complexity

Euro working Group on Methodology of Societal Complexity

P.O. Box. 3286, 1001 AB Amsterdam,

The Netherlands , Europe Tel: +31 20 6927526

E-Mail: DeTombe@nosmo.nl

http://www.geocities.com/doriendetombe

 

Session II:     Societal Complexity and Sustainable Development

 

Chair: Rosanna Memoli

Full Professor Methodology of Social Research, Faculty of Statistic -" La Sapienza "  

University of Rome , Italy , Europe

E-Mail: Rosanna.Memoli@uniroma1.it

 

Abstracts

Session I:           Societal Complexity: Safety and Healthcare

 

Chair: Dorien DeTombe

 

International Research Society on Methodology of Societal Complexity

Euro working Group on Methodology of Societal Complexity

P.O. Box. 3286, 1001 AB Amsterdam,

The Netherlands , Europe Tel: +31 20 6927526

E-Mail: DeTombe@nosmo.nl

http://www.geocities.com/doriendetombe

 

 

I-1 Group decision-making through Cognition, Conviction, Collaboration, Confrontation and Action-Participation

 

José G. Hernández R. MSc

Universidad Metropolitana, Escuela de Ingeniería de Sistemas.

Caracas Venezuela.

jhernandez@unimet.edu.ve

 

María J. García G. MSc

Minimax Consultores C.A. Gerencia General.

Apartado 78239. Caracas 1074  Venezuela.

MJGarcia.Minimax@mercaglob.com

 

 

When social groups try to solve problems affecting their community, when getting to the process of making decisions, it is possible that conflicts arise, since each of the members of the group usually have different visions from the problem and are affected in different ways, for which his perspectives and alternatives of solution take very diverse approaches.

A methodology created to help to minimize these conflicts that arise in the moment of choosing possible alternatives of solution before problems of the communities is Cognition (Knowledge), Conviction, Collaboration, Confrontation and Action-Participation (4C-AP).

The 4C-AP, it gathers many of their premises from other techniques of group decision making such as: Nominal group, Brains storms, Decisions by consensus, The Delphi technique, Didactic interaction, Collective Negotiation, between others. Taking aspects of each of them it presents its five essential steps that it is to take to the group of decision for the stages of Cognition (Knowledge) of the problem, Conviction about possible alternatives, Collaboration in the construction of a better alternative, Confrontation as for promoting the best alternative and Action-Participation, in the sense that any process of making decisions must lead to action.

This 4C-AP technique, does not need any type of previous knowledge about decision making and in extreme cases only the knowledge on the problem that needs to be solved is necessary, for which it represents an important alternative to be applied in communities of low economic income, in order to choose alternatives of solution for the problems that affect them normally.

From everything previous the goal of this work arises: To show across a hypothetical case as the technique Cognition (Knowledge), Conviction, Collaboration, Confrontation and Action-Participation (4C-AP), can be used to search for alternatives of solution to problems that affect social groups of scarce resources.

 

Key words: Social problems, Cognition (Knowledge), Conviction, Collaboration, Confrontation, Action-Participation, Groups making decisions.

 

 

I-2 New models and concepts for handling complex societal problems: new tools, results and prospects

 

Prof. dr. Alexander Makarenko, Prof.

Institute for applied system analysis at National technical university of Ukraine (KPI), 

Prospect Pobedy 37, Kiev 04214 , UKRAINE

makalex@i.com.ua

 

Considering complex societal systems requires the applications of all existing recently scientific and social tools. System analysis and mathematical modeling give a large variety of concepts and models for understanding and foreseen of social system behavior. Existing of many problems and tools requires the reconsidering of possible goals of societal transformations, possible problems and review of possibilities, advantages and drawbacks of existing models. Also for many current practical problems the development of new models is necessary.

So in the first part of this talk the critical review of existing models and presumable research problems are proposed. System dynamics, differential equations, master equations, cellular automata, multiagent models, networks models are discussed.

Then some absolutely new models of social systems proposed by author are described. The models are of neuronet types with associative memory property and accounting of mentality of individuals of social systems. Accounting of anticipation property of individuals allows to propose the frame for considering multiplicity of scenarios in social systems and to consider the decision - making in such systems.

The applications of proposed concepts for many problems in societal systems are described. The list of applications includes the next issues: sustainable development, cities evolution, crowd movements, opinion formation, organization evolution, eGovernment, complexity definitions.

 

 

 

I-3 Education and Change : a New Structural Approach

 

R. Memoli, B. Baldazzi, S.Bovadilla, A.Cinti, M. Pantoja, A.Passero,S. Zicari

Sapienza University of Rome

Italy Europe

Rosanna.memoli@uniroma1.it

 

Culture and knowledge are agents of reproduction and change. The educational policies, aimed to

transfer culture, values, norms and to stimulate new knowledge, are oriented to social, economical and political development. Therefore educational system goes through the societal system interacting at level of organization and social structure, as well as at level of individuals mechanism and actions. The framework of an educational system is not a one way decision-making process, but is the result of a complex development. Often future expectations based on current assessments are not realized, since it is difficult to verify the various dimensions and trajectories of change.

It is proposed a model for the evaluation of an university system, adopting a new structural

approach, using the concept of social capital and a research strategy based on social networks

analysis. In the form of an Italian case study, the paper presents results aimed to show the validity of an integrated approach assuming the existence of several techniques, able to study a phenomenon under different aspects and in terms of their structural patterning. The focus is on the multi-method strategies and tools for handling complex problems characterized by high levels of uncertainty.


 

Session II:     Societal Complexity and Sustainable Development

 

Chair: Rosanna Memoli

Full Professor Methodology of Social Research, Faculty of Statistic -" La Sapienza "  

University of Rome , Italy , Europe

E-Mail: Rosanna.Memoli@uniroma1.it

 

II-1 Methodology for societal complexity: the climate change example

 

Dr Dorien DeTombe (MSc. Ph.D.)

Chair International Research Society on Methodology Societal Complexity,

P.O. Box. 3286, 1001 AB Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Europe

Tel: +31 20 6927526   Email: detombe@nosmo.nl

http://www.geocities.com/doriendetombe

 

 

Abstract

 

Scientific as well as politically debates are fighting over attention on the subject of climate change. Climate change is a complex societal issue which implicates that the situation has to be analysed according to the theory of societal complexity. Each complex societal problem contains three basic element: knowledge, power and emotion. The Compram methodology is a scientifically based methodology based on the theory of societal complexity which gives guidelines to handle real life complex societal problems. The methodology gives directions to analyse, discuss, make scenario’s, negotiate, make decisions and change complex societal problems. A problem handling team of experts is invited to make a conceptual model of the problem, then the main actors are invited in order to make fruitful sustainable decisions for interventions and implementations. The Compram methodology has six basic steps: knowledge, power, negotiation, societal reaction (emotions), implementation and evaluation. Each step is performed by a group of problem handlers guided by a facilitator, selected by a problem owner. Thinking and handling according to the Compram methodology supports a more sustainable definition and more sustainable interventions for changing a complex societal problem. The Compram methodology is a framework methodology that gives within the direction of the basic steps room for all kinds of other methods and tools, such a the seven–layer model for communication including system dynamic modelling.

Climate change is used to explain the theory and the methodology. Climate change can be a threat to safety. The Compram methodology is advised by the OECD to handle complex societal issues, on global safety.

 

.

 

 

II-2 The complexity of securing the interests of children born of war in post-conflict situations

 

Dr. Ingvill C. Mochmann

Head of ZA-EUROLAB

European Data Laboratory for Comparative Social Research GESIS-ZA Bachemer Str. 40

D-50931 Cologne  phone +49 221 47694-65

email ingvill.mochmann@gesis.org

http://www.gesis.org/eurolab

http://www.mothersinscience.eu

 

Throughout history, there have probably always been children born during and after conflicts and wars were the father has been a member of an enemy, allied or peacekeeping force and the mother a local citizen. Knowledge available so far indicates that the consequences for many of these children have been devastating, independent of whether the relationship between mother and father was of a loving or exploitative nature. They are exposed to among others hatred and rejection in family and community, stigmatisation both at local and state level and even infanticide. The challenge in securing the interest of these children is complex and includes many different aspects such as for example national and international law (which citizenship should the child have), medical issues (physical and psychological support, particularly if mother is a rape victim), social services (children of enemy soldiers may be excluded from these services), information policies (community members need information that for example rape victims and their children and also girl child soldiers and their babies are victims as well). This paper will present interdisciplinary approaches, methods and co-operations existing so far with regard to collecting information on children born of war and securing their interests. Furthermore, future needs and methods will be discussed on how to help these children without increasing stigmatisation or even putting their lives at risk. 

 

Keywords: complex societal problems, children born of war, stigmatisation, hidden populations

 

 

 

II-3 Issues of sustainable development and societal complexity in power sector in india: the methodology of life cycle assessment

Dr. Ashish Singh and Dr. Sanjay Singh

Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research

Goregaon (E),Mumbai 400 065, INDIA

Tel:91-22-28400919*269

Fax: 91-22-2841 6399

Email: sanjays@igidr.ac.in and ashishsingh@igidr.ac.in

 

Over the past few decades, various changes have taken place in economic and social institutions in India . The degree of production activities and changes in life style has intensified the demand for electricity in the country where already almost 30% population doesnot has access to reliable power supply. In order to meet this challenge the Government of India is planning to set up large number of coal based power plants across the country over the period of next few years. Coal already has the largest share of utility power generation in India , accounting for approximately 70% of all utility-produced electricity at large scale and captive levels. But this kind of massive and blind planning and implementation without any sound background analysis will lead to various complex societal problems. In light of the above this paper performs life cycle assessment (LCA) of coal based electricity generation process from mining of coal upto distribution of electric power in order to not only identify, evaluate, and minimize economical, social and environmental costs but also to examine different aspects of current and future coal based power generating systems. The system analysis comprises of study of various processes namely mining, transportation and electricity generation to name a few and compares the life cycle cost (LCC) of power generation at pithead (within 1km of mine) with other schemes. This assessment includes various impacts and externalities arising from extraction, processing, transportation of fuel, construction of power plants and generation as well as distribution of electricity. The evaluation and analysis uses information collected from the new power plant proposals which are under consideration in India . The understanding of economical, social and environmental implications of producing electricity from coal is an important component of any policy making to reduce total cost and sustainable utilization of resources. To ensure the sustainability, we need a better plan and coordination among different institutions dealing with social, health, environmental and economic aspects because handling complex societal problems needs a special interdisciplinary approach. The framework which has been developed helps to analyze: (a) Average cost of power generation per MW and efficiency of currently operating coal-based power plants (Large and Captive) in India, (b) Impact on ground water due to captive power plants, (c) Impact on fossil fuels and other resources, (d) the sustainability of power generation models and (e) health and environmental impacts. The methodology used for calculating life cycle cost (LCC) takes into account valuation of different costs (cost of mining, washing, transportation of coal and water, generation costs, social and environmental costs) and benefits from better planning and coordination amongst different institutions to obtain a monetary measure of net costs and benefits for each year at present value. Finally the paper compares the life cycle assessment (LCA) of coal based power with power generated using renewable sources and proposes some recommendation which can be implemented in policy decisions. 

 

 

 

 

  

Dr. Dorien  DeTombe

Chair International Research Society on Methodology of Societal Complexity

P.O. Box. 3286, 1001 AB Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Europe

Tel: +31 20 6927526

E-Mail: DeTombe@nosmo.nl ; http://www.geocities.com/doriendetombe

 

home 

 

©Dorien J. DeTombe, All rights reserved, first created November  2007, updated May 2008